Fertilizer companies and the Fertilizer Association of India (FAI) have urged the Uttar Pradesh government to withdraw its ban on the sale of non-subsidized specialty fertilizers. Industry players say the move could negatively impact soil health, crop productivity, and the availability of balanced nutrients to farmers.
Background of the UP Ban
The Uttar Pradesh Agriculture Directorate issued an order on 13 January 2026 prohibiting major urea companies from selling non-subsidized fertilizers such as zinc, calcium nitrate, zinc sulphate, and bentonite sulphur. The restriction was imposed after complaints that dealers were allegedly forcing farmers to buy costly products along with subsidized urea.
The ban applies to several leading fertilizer firms including cooperative, private, and public sector companies.
Industry Concerns Over the Decision
Fertilizer companies argue that the restriction could have wider implications beyond business losses.
Key concerns raised by industry:
Balanced nutrient use may decline, affecting soil fertility
Farmers could lose access to essential micronutrients
Policy inconsistency may discourage private and foreign investment
The ban may open space for low-quality or unregulated products
Industry representatives also stated that the restricted products are licensed and approved under the Fertilizer Control Order and have been used for decades.
Impact on Soil Health and Agriculture
Experts highlight that India already faces excessive nitrogen usage due to cheap urea prices. Limiting specialty fertilizers could worsen nutrient imbalance and reduce long-term soil productivity.
Micronutrients like zinc, sulphur, boron, and calcium are essential for maintaining soil fertility and crop yield. Therefore, restricting their sale may indirectly affect agricultural output and farm profitability.
Industry Appeal to the Government
FAI Director General Dr. Suresh Kumar Chaudhary said companies have formally written to state authorities requesting reconsideration of the decision. The industry maintains that it does not promote “tagging” and supports fair distribution practices.
Companies further noted that the order contradicts the government’s push to provide fertilizers, seeds, and crop protection products under one roof through PM-Kisan Samriddhi Kendras.
Market Insight
The UP ban reflects increasing regulatory scrutiny in the fertilizer distribution system. However, the decision has sparked debate between preventing unfair sales practices and ensuring access to balanced crop nutrition.
Industry watchers believe a calibrated approach with stricter monitoring rather than a blanket ban may better address concerns while supporting sustainable agriculture.
